-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TkDQM: Add DQM modules for monitoring VectorHits #39962
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39962/32891
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39962/32895
|
A new Pull Request was created by @sroychow (Suvankar Roy Chowdhury) for master. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters:
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-196d42/28757/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
trackerphase2DQMSource_wVhits = cms.Sequence( pixDigiMon | ||
+ otDigiMon | ||
+rechitMonitorIT | ||
+ clusterMonitorIT | ||
+ clusterMonitorOT | ||
+ acceptedVecHitsmon | ||
+ rejectedVecHitsmon | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
trackerphase2DQMSource_wVhits = cms.Sequence( pixDigiMon | |
+ otDigiMon | |
+rechitMonitorIT | |
+ clusterMonitorIT | |
+ clusterMonitorOT | |
+ acceptedVecHitsmon | |
+ rejectedVecHitsmon | |
) | |
trackerphase2DQMSource_wVhits = trackerphase2DQMSource.copy() | |
trackerphase2DQMSource_wVhits += cms.Sequence(acceptedVecHitsmon +rejectedVecHitsmon) |
is more compact and should be equivalent.
Pull request #39962 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39962/32979
|
Pull request #39962 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-196d42/28923/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
This adds about 110MB of histogram memory, about 1090 monitoring elements. Are they all necessary? |
These histograms are added only in the workflows running the vector hits reconstruction (a very limited subset of the full matrix, activated by the |
@mmusich thank you very much for the clarification |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Work done by @gsaha009 to introduce DQM modules to monitor VectorHits. Two collections of vector hits are monitored -
accepted
andrejected
.PR validation:
Wf
20834.9
runs fine.If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported
NA