-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TsosGaussianStateConversions] Require GSF states to be positive definite [12_6_X] #39873
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39873/32784
|
A new Pull Request was created by @swagata87 (Swagata Mukherjee) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
assign tracking-pog
|
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-94fd56/28589/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1
Footnotes
|
urgent
|
type egamma, tracking |
This fix is useful for HLT also, see #39570 (comment). |
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1
|
For the record, when the release containing the backport of this PR (#39903) has been tested at tier0, a job that previously was giving an exception, is now having a segfault https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/replay-testing-for-cmssw-12-4-11/17062/4 |
Hello @mmusich I copied the folder as indicated in the cmsTalk link you shared, From what is reported there,
But it did not crash. Am I missing something? |
Hi Swagata @swagata87, |
The t0 logs say
for 0-5. How many are tried? Is it a case of everything failing and the code not expecting that? |
From the file from T0, [1]
|
follow-up issue at #39987 is perhaps a better place to continue the discussion. |
PR description:
This PR is to solve a crash in prompt-reco that led to a paused job as reported in https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/logic-error-in-reco-job-for-run-360888-dataset-parkingdoublemuonlowmass2/16641, and discussed in #39570.
It was checked, from 12_4_X, that this patch cures the crash in low-pT electron reconstruction.
PR validation:
runTheMatrix.py -l 12434.0
ran fine.From 12_4_X, it was checked that [Base] and [Base+thisPR] leads to same number of electrons, photons and low-pT electrons to be reconstructed, with same pT spectra. This check was made by running on 200 raw events on this file:
/eos/cms/tier0/store/data/Run2022F/EGamma/RAW/v1/000/361/197/00000/76bd97fa-4ad6-4d85-b941-014e3ed27f9c.root
Tagging @francescobrivio as this week's ORM.
Backport of this PR might be necessary.