Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-alca231 Update some of the defaults for Muon analysis code in HCalAlCaRecoProducers and HcalCalibAlgos #39687

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2022

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda bsunanda commented Oct 10, 2022

PR description:

Update some of the defaults for Muon analysis code in HCalAlCaRecoProducers and HcalCalibAlgos. The defaults were setup for Run2 (2017). Now the defaults refer to RUn3 operation. Also a new parameter is added (threshold of muon momentum to be saved)

PR validation:

Use the runTheMatrix test workflows

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39687/32502

  • This PR adds an extra 48KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39687/32503

  • This PR adds an extra 48KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Calibration/HcalAlCaRecoProducers (alca)
  • Calibration/HcalCalibAlgos (alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39687/32505

  • This PR adds an extra 48KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #39687 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-593e2e/28143/summary.html
COMMIT: cdce14b
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-09-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/39687/28143/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-593e2e/41834.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D94+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3392309
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3392284
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 204 log files, 49 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@ChrisMisan
Copy link
Contributor

+alca

  • differences only in msgLogger
  • changes to the parameters and minor technical improvements

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda please summarize and/or add a link in the PR description why these changes in configurations parameters are needed

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have added some comments in the description. It is for transition from Run2 to Run3.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants