-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12.5.X] zeroing error of Pixel barycenter ME and other optimizations #39593
[12.5.X] zeroing error of Pixel barycenter ME and other optimizations #39593
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_12_5_X. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-29900d/27980/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cms-sw/dqm-l2 any objection to signing this backport? |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
backport of #39448
PR description:
Title says is all, to allow cleaner pixel barycenter comparisons when validating conditions updates, cf e.g.: https://tinyurl.com/2nupfvg2 .
Profited to add a couple of minor code optimizations.
PR validation:
cmssw
compilesIf this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
verbatim backport of #39448 for data-taking purposes