-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modernize SiStripMonitorClient #39518
Conversation
type bugfix,trk |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39518/32277
|
A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b5d35e/27807/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
OK, I can make them |
assign trk-dpg
By the way the comparison in the DQM bin-by-bin does not look good (see link) -1 fwiw. |
I decoupled the two changes in this PR, as the migration to
|
@perrotta I fixed the duplicate includes, thanks for noticing that! |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39518/32516
|
Pull request #39518 was updated. @connorpa, @sroychow, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b5d35e/28161/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
@sroychow @emanueleusai can you please re-sign? |
+1 |
@sroychow last updates were just cleanings: I think you can sign once again fror @cms-sw/trk-dpg-l2 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Since I touched the package and gave a lot of warnings about the Legacy modules,
::one::
modulePR validation:
Code compiles w/o warning.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
N/A