-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[NanoAOD] Adding correct Iso filter name (without cut values) for Run3 #39230
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39230/31855
|
A new Pull Request was created by @wonpoint4 (Won Jun) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @swertz, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test runtestPhysicsToolsNanoAOD had ERRORS RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...RelVals-INPUT
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39230/32012
|
integration test running https://gitlab.cern.ch/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-integration/-/issues/178 |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Dear experts, |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-50442b/27750/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+xpog
That won't be necessary, 124X is closed for Nano and there will be no re-nano in 125X. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Related to https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSHLT-2312
This creates problem about the maintenance of the PromptNano AOD when the HLT menu changes during the datataking. We need a larger discussion about this. In any case, @wonpoint4 is your PR compatible with the HLT menu both before and after CMSHLT-2312, or only after CMSHLT-2312 (ie. it should be compatible with both HLT v1.2 and HLT v1.3) |
cc: @jordan-martins |
Yes, this PR is supposed to be compatible with HLT menu before/after CMSHLT-2312, like compatible with menu during the whole Run3, and even the Run2. |
We have now decided that we would backport changes to the trigger object filter names to 124X to allow prompt nano to pick up those changes, even if it breaks compatibility with Run2 or existing V10 samples. Can you please make a backport to 124X @wonpoint4 ? In principle the same changes should then also be applied to the frozen V10 config in master: https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/V10/triggerObjects_cff.py |
@wonpoint4 with the backport merged we now have an inconsistency between the nanoV10 in 124X and the frozen V10 config in master. Can I ask you to make another PR to master to apply the same changes to https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/V10/triggerObjects_cff.py ? |
PR description:
Adding correct Iso filter name (without cut values) for Run3
Relevant JIRA ticket : https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSHLT-2312
And I was wondering that I have to make backport PRs to the both of 124X and 125X.