introduce G4e refitter in the tracker alignment machinery

[mmusich]

PR description:

This PR has 3 commits:

• 63c2db6 introduces the machinery to be able to run the Geant4e refit in the trackselectionRefitting code, that is consumed by all the alignment and validation algorithms.
• 0ea34e9 adds a dedicated unit test for this feature, now that Try to fix GeometryProducer and G4e examples #38864 has fixed the core algorithm to be able to run in recent releases.
• 0019004 is a leftover from add support for ALCARECOTkAlJetHT to trackselectionRefitting #39013. In this commit I supply coverage for the track collections introduced in PR [Tracker Alignment] Introduce ALCARECOTkAlDiMuonAndVertex #33770.

PR validation:

Relies on the augmented unit tests

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, but shall be backported.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39070/31573

• This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Alignment/OfflineValidation/test/BuildFile.xml modified in PR(s): Introduction of New-All-In-One tool for Offline Validation of TrkAlignment  #38304

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Alignment/CommonAlignment (alca)
• Alignment/OfflineValidation (alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@pakhotin, @mmusich, @adewit, @tocheng, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mmusich]

type trk, new-feature

[mmusich]

please test

[tvami]

is this supposed to be commented out?

[mmusich]

for the moment, yes

[tvami]

ok

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-55c21e/26833/summary.html
COMMIT: 0019004
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-08-15-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/39070/26833/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3692476
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3692446
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 50 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[tvami]

+alca

• unit tests pass

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[qliphy]

+1