-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HGCAL geometry] Fix definition of 60degree sectors 0 and 1 #38861
Conversation
jbsauvan
commented
Jul 26, 2022
•
edited
Loading
edited
- Fix 60deg sector definition in the sector rotation utility (some wafers were wrongly assigned to sector 0 instead of sector 1).
- The function where this fix has been made is not used anywhere yet, so no change is expected in the output.
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38861/31273
|
A new Pull Request was created by @jbsauvan (Jean-Baptiste Sauvan) for master. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @bsunanda, @makortel, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
@jbsauvan please edit the name to make clear that this PR relates to HGCal |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-483c75/26460/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
type bug-fix |
+Upgrade I don't see anything change in PR test, maybe because it is too small test or the change of the sector does not effect sim/reco results. |
Hello @srimanob |
OK, Thanks for clarification @jbsauvan |
@srimanob done |
+geometry |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |