Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HGCAL geometry] Fix definition of 60degree sectors 0 and 1 #38861

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2022

Conversation

jbsauvan
Copy link
Contributor

@jbsauvan jbsauvan commented Jul 26, 2022

  • Fix 60deg sector definition in the sector rotation utility (some wafers were wrongly assigned to sector 0 instead of sector 1).
  • The function where this fix has been made is not used anywhere yet, so no change is expected in the output.

image

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38861/31273

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jbsauvan (Jean-Baptiste Sauvan) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Geometry/HGCalCommonData (geometry, upgrade)

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @bsunanda, @makortel, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@trtomei, @bsunanda, @beaucero, @fabiocos this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild Please test

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@jbsauvan please edit the name to make clear that this PR relates to HGCal

@jbsauvan jbsauvan changed the title Fix definition of 60degree sectors 0 and 1 [HGCAL geometry] Fix definition of 60degree sectors 0 and 1 Jul 26, 2022
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-483c75/26460/summary.html
COMMIT: a7cb997
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-07-25-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/38861/26460/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3667670
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3667634
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 50 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 210 log files, 47 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

type bug-fix

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

I don't see anything change in PR test, maybe because it is too small test or the change of the sector does not effect sim/reco results.

@jbsauvan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello @srimanob
Actually the function where the change has been made is not used anywhere yet. So that makes sense that no changes can be seen.

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

OK, Thanks for clarification @jbsauvan
Could you please add your statement on PR description? Thanks.

@jbsauvan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@srimanob done

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

+geometry

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 471587e into cms-sw:master Jul 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants