-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12_4_X] Inherit AlCaPPS_Run3 from AlCa #38838
Conversation
Backport of #38837 |
A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for CMSSW_12_4_X. It involves the following packages:
@perrotta, @rappoccio, @cmsbuild, @qliphy, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
type bugfix,ctpps |
urgent
|
@cmsbuild , please test
|
assign alca |
New categories assigned: alca @yuanchao,@francescobrivio,@malbouis,@tvami,@ChrisMisan you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-95b8f0/26406/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
from Configuration.DataProcessing.Utils import stepALCAPRODUCER,dqmIOSource,harvestingMode,dictIO,gtNameAndConnect,addMonitoring | ||
from Configuration.Eras.Era_Run3_cff import Run3 | ||
import FWCore.ParameterSet.Config as cms | ||
|
||
class AlCaPPS_Run3(Scenario): | ||
class AlCaPPS_Run3(AlCa): | ||
def __init__(self): | ||
Scenario.__init__(self) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe I'm wrong, but I would think that this should be the AlCa class being initialised here, instead of the Scenario one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm probably that would be better. But it does work like this too... My understanding is that it initializes the Scenario
but inherits from AlCa
, so when the harvesting function was missing earlier now it's included. The only missing part so far was this harvesting function, the rest worked with Scenario
too. So that's why I think this works.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given that it works, I'd prefer to keep it like this. Do you agree?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I agree.
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_5_X is complete. This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
See #38837
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Backport of #38837