-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ECAL - Sort digis collections coming from GPU unpacking - 124x #38323
ECAL - Sort digis collections coming from GPU unpacking - 124x #38323
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @thomreis (Thomas Reis) for CMSSW_12_4_X. It involves the following packages:
@Martin-Grunewald, @clacaputo, @cmsbuild, @missirol, @slava77, @jpata can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
backport of #38321 |
enable gpu |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f8957a/25433/summary.html GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Pull request #38323 was updated. @Martin-Grunewald, @clacaputo, @cmsbuild, @missirol, @slava77, @jpata can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f8957a/25463/summary.html GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+hlt See #38321 (comment). |
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
urgent |
+1 |
PR description:
Contrary to the ECAL digis collections unpacked on a CPU, which are sorted by detector ID, the collections produced from digis that were unpacked on GPU are unsorted. This causes problems with the
find()
function of theedm::DataFrameContainer
, which only works for sorted detector IDs.Sorting the collections produced by
EcalCPUDigisProducer
fixes this.This also adds some code simplifications to
HLTEcalPhiSymFilter
, which is the module for which the issue manifested itself first.Addresses https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSHLT-2335
PR validation:
The digis collection stored by
hltEcalPhiSymFilter
matches between CPU and GPU machines after sorting the collections.if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Backport of #38321 needed for ECAL calibrations