-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Follow up to 37617 #37798
Follow up to 37617 #37798
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37798/29709
|
A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee for master. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @clacaputo, @slava77, @jpata, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37798/29711
|
Pull request #37798 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @clacaputo, @slava77, @jpata, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
test parameters:
|
please test |
assign heterogeneous |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6adb12/24443/summary.html GPU Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37798/29929
|
Pull request #37798 was updated. @emanueleusai, @makortel, @fwyzard, @ahmad3213, @jfernan2, @clacaputo, @slava77, @jpata, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
+heterogeneous |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6adb12/24620/summary.html GPU Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
urgent |
+reconstruction
|
@emanueleusai could you please check this PR, and either confirm your previous signature or comment otherwise? |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Follow up to #37617 :
fix issue highlighted in GPUvsCPU: updates to modules and workflows for pixel reconstruction #37617 (comment);
fix misalignment for
.501
and.502
running on CPU (see GPUvsCPU: updates to modules and workflows for pixel reconstruction #37617 (comment)). The wfs are now identical (same naming, same results, see 501 and 502 on CPU). This is accomplished (whenpixelNtupletFit
modifier is on) by:when only
pixelNtupletFit
modifier is on:- adding
siPixelRecHitsPreSplittingCPU
, which is the actual producer on CPU, to the task;- replacing the
siPixelRecHitsPreSplitting@cpu
with andEDAlias
for legacy formats;- adding
siPixelRecHitsPreSplittingSoA
as aSwitchProducerCUDA
with only@cpu
branch as anEDAlias
for SoA formats;when also the
gpu
modifier is on:- adding
siPixelRecHitsPreSplittingCUDA
, which is the actual producer on GPU, to the task;- adding to the
siPixelRecHitsPreSplitting@cuda
branch theCUDA
to legacy converter;- adding to the
siPixelRecHitsPreSplitting@cuda
branch theCUDA
to SoA converter;add GPU and CPU local reco validation in
monitorpixelSoACompareSource
(the CPUvsGPU will come in a later PR).PR validation:
Running
39434.501
and11634.x
, with x=501
,502
and503
.