-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid DQMIO file GUID collisions #37405
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37405/29069
|
A new Pull Request was created by @dan131riley (Dan Riley) for master. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
urgent |
please test |
type bugfix |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Dan!
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e9662f/23514/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Upon implementing comments from @makortel , from DQM side, as far as I can tell with the unitTests available which I have made privately, the PR is fine. Thanks @dan131riley ! |
I've implemented Matti's suggestions and tested the handling of input files without the new GUID. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37405/29085
|
Pull request #37405 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e9662f/23531/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
ping bot |
PR description:
As covered in #37240, the algorithm ROOT uses for
TUUID
can result in high filename collisions rates, which has been causing operational problems for the tier0. Most framework uses of GUIDs were switched to using random GUIDs due to UUID collisions in containers. This PR makes the same switch for DQMIO, and also restores the registration of DQMIO input files to the FJR.PR validation:
Passes tests. There's more validation I'd like to do, but I'm pushing this out now as there's high demand for a fix for this issue.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
This is not a backport. Backports to 12_3_0 and 12_2_0 will follow shortly.