-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change quality criteria for some supercrystals in the Ecal Endcaps for LED Quality plots [CMSSW_12_3_X] #37404
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @abhih1 (Abhirami Harilal) for CMSSW_12_3_X. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9e194e/23512/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_4_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
backport of #37378 |
please test with cms-data/DQM-EcalMonitorClient#2 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9e194e/23564/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
PR description:
This PR is done to modify the quality criteria of a few Supercrystals/Towers in DQM LED quality plots of the ECAL Endcaps. This set of supercrystals are known to be problematic by the ECAL LED experts and are being monitored. However it does not affect the quality of physics data and so in order to avoid the DQM displaying them as BAD constantly the quality criteria for them are being changed. The list of supercrystals tower ids are stored in the data file
SClist.dat
PR validation:
This PR was validated by running the Standard Ecal calibration workflow on a test run and observing the DQM output file on an offline DQM test gui to confirm the code changes work as expected. The plots were also approved by the ECAL LED expert.
The PR was also validated by running the DQM relval workflow 136.874 using the runTheMatrix script
runTheMatrix.py -l 136.874 --ibeos
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
This PR is a backport of #37378 to have the changes available in CMSSW_12_3_X which is next in the production cycle.