Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run3-gex126B Try to resolve compilation warnings in RecoParticleFlow/Configuration #37400

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 26, 2022

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Try to resolve compilation warnings in RecoParticleFlow/Configuration

PR validation:

Use the runTheMatrix test workflows

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37400/29060

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37400/29062

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoParticleFlow/Configuration (reconstruction)

@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmarionncern, @lgray, @seemasharmafnal, @hatakeyamak this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5acf43/23498/summary.html
COMMIT: c8b921c
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-03-29-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/37400/23498/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3585896
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3585872
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 200 log files, 45 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Mar 30, 2022

Similar comment about the /test/ code being abandoned here as in #37399.

@bsunanda bsunanda changed the title Run3=gex126B Try to resolve compilation warnings in RecoParticleFlow/Configuration Run3-gex126B Try to resolve compilation warnings in RecoParticleFlow/Configuration Mar 31, 2022
@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jpata I came across this compilation warning while I was editing a Geometry package and did checkdeps and build. It is annoying to see compilation warning. So I fixed it so that the warning goes away. I did not bother to test its functionality. Just ran the standard tests which may or may not cover this. If you think these corrections are redundant I can delete those classes. But I thought it is safer to remove the warnings and let others decide about its retainment or removal.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jpata @laurenhay @hatakeyamak So instead of fixing the two classes, let me then delete them in this PR. Hope you agree

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jpata Can I delete the affected classes from the repository as done in #37399? Please confirm

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37400/29376

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #37400 was updated. @jpata, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5acf43/23984/summary.html
COMMIT: d8dbca7
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-04-18-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37400/23984/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3589937
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3589907
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 200 log files, 45 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Apr 25, 2022

@cms-sw/pf-l2 please note the removal of the test code here.

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Apr 25, 2022

type pf

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Apr 26, 2022

+reconstruction

  • technical unused code cleanup in PF tests
  • follow-ups may be useful

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants