-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add TICL from Reco customise #37343
Add TICL from Reco customise #37343
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37343/28991
|
@cmsbuild please test |
A new Pull Request was created by @rovere (Marco Rovere) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cc4568/23383/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@rovere just to check - this does not run in any standard workflow, it's just for "private" tests by the TICL team? |
If TICLFromReco is run on top of the optimized HGCAL-only event content, the producer is not needed. The local density map computed while creating the layer clusters is part of the special HGCAL-only event content. Unfortunately, that product is not persisted in any ordinary data-tiers but is consumed by the HGCAL validation. Adding the layercluster producer fixes the bug and makes the customize even more generic.
@jpata that's exactly correct. I'd prefer to have it in release so that it can be used by all the developers. Re-running just TICL -related reconstruction from RECO, instead of the full workflow is just much faster. And the event content is up to ~10 times smaller. Quite useful, I think. |
@cmsbuild please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37343/28997
|
Pull request #37343 was updated. @jpata, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please check and sign again. |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cc4568/23445/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+Upgrade The introduced customization does not effect the main workflow. |
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Add a
customise
function to be able to quickly run HGCAL TICL-reconstruction from the RECO data-tier. This will cut down the development cycle by a considerable amount. Also, save the output using a dedicated, slimmed, HGCAL-only event content to save space.PR validation:
Local testing works just fine.