-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add saturated EGM regression tags to Run-3 MC GTs #37102
Conversation
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild , please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37102/28597
|
A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @tvami, @yuanchao, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1f47de/22745/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
@swagata87 I tought the saturated EGM was affecting the high pT electrons, but in the test comparison I see the LowPtElectron has differences (here for example). Could you clarify if this is expected? |
Hi @francescobrivio
and then makes necessary changes on top of it. So in my PR(#37100) since I changed I saw @perrotta suggested some changes in #37100, which will address this issue as well. I will implement his suggestions soon |
hold
|
Pull request has been put on hold by @francescobrivio |
unhold |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1f47de/22776/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
urgent
|
+1 |
PR description:
Add saturated electron and photon regression tags as requested in https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/mc-update-of-new-egm-regression-conditions/4637/8
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/123X_mcRun3_2021_design_v9/123X_mcRun3_2021_design_v10
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/123X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v9/123X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v10
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/123X_mcRun3_2021cosmics_realistic_deco_v9/123X_mcRun3_2021cosmics_realistic_deco_v10
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/123X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_HI_v9/123X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_HI_v10
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/123X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v9/123X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v10
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/123X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v9/123X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v10
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/123X_mcRun4_realistic_v6/123X_mcRun4_realistic_v7
Diffs are in the 8 requested tags alone, except for the Phase-2 GT where the new L1T menu was also added [as a leftover from https://github.com//pull/37089] (no differences expected or observed related to this change.)
PR validation:
test parameters:
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A