-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
use auto-generated configuration fragments in a few RecoTracker
classes
#37023
use auto-generated configuration fragments in a few RecoTracker
classes
#37023
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37023/28451
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT AddOn Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test testMuonTrackRefitting had ERRORS RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...
RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
AddOn Tests
Expand to see more addon errors ... |
b069ad1
to
27b04ac
Compare
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37023/28459
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
…e CCC fillDescriptions
27b04ac
to
3cb2459
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37023/28460
|
Pull request #37023 was updated. @jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-45f544/22586/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This is a technical follow-up to PR #36983 and in particular to #36983 (comment).
As the title says the purpose is to use auto-generated configuration fragments in a few
RecoTracker
classes instead of direct implementations in the python code.I profit of this PR to clean-up the
getFilledConfigurationDescription4CCC
method introduced in commit 10e227e to be versatile (e.g. serve all possible values of the CCC).PR validation:
cmssw
compiles after checking dependencies.if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A