-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SiPixelClusterizer: No digis to clusterize warning into error #36968
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36968/28333
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-302e24/22422/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please note @emiglior |
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
hold Based on discussion with pixel experts, this might actually be a symptom of a bug in the raw2digi. Will check that first. |
Pull request has been put on hold by @mmusich |
unhold |
8e5b2f7
to
5bc0563
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36968/28624
|
Pull request #36968 was updated. @jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please check and sign again. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-302e24/22766/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
See discussion at #36326 (comment) and #37035 (comment).
In PR #37035, the logic of the pixel raw2digi was changed in order to avoid producing empty
DetSet
s in the Pixel digiDetSerVector
. This usually happened when a givenDetId
only contained invalid pixels (0,0) and no other valid pixel. These were anyway discarded later on, leading to the creation of emptyDetSet
s.Now after #37035 will be merged, empty
DetSet
s should never happen and thus the message is transformed into an error.PR validation:
cmssw
compilesif this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A