-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add labels to SiPixelFakeLorentzAngleESSource
and SiPixelLorentzAngleReader
#36283
Add labels to SiPixelFakeLorentzAngleESSource
and SiPixelLorentzAngleReader
#36283
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36283/26976
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
c495f9b
to
7cfb9d5
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36283/26977
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @ggovi, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild , please test |
7cfb9d5
to
d991695
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-36283/26987
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25b5f0/20841/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
For future reference, all ESProducers (and ESSources) already have a mechanism to add a label, it is the configuration option |
@Dr15Jones I noticed that here, but it was not clear to me what was the effect of it.
but then in
the label is not passed as argument. |
Yes.
Either way is fine. I just wanted to point out no change was actually needed. The |
PR description:
This is a follow-up to PR #36265. As there are different flavors (
label
s) ofSiPixelLorentzAngleRcd
(e.g."forWidth"
and"forAlignment"
) a label mechanism needs to be added to account for such cases.I profit to enhance
SiPixelLorentzAngleReader
to deal with labels and to add afillDescription
method.PR validation:
Unit tests, pass.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A