Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed CMS deprecation warnings from MagneticField/Engine #35672

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2021

Conversation

Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

  • converted legacy modules to one::
  • added needed esConsumes calls

PR validation:

Code compiles.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35672/25959

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • MagneticField/Engine (reconstruction)

@jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@namapane this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 14, 2021

@cmsbuild please test

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: ClangBuild
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9b65d8/19626/summary.html
COMMIT: 36383b7
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-14-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35672/19626/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Clang Build

I found compilation warning while trying to compile with clang. Command used:

USER_CUDA_FLAGS='--expt-relaxed-constexpr' USER_CXXFLAGS='-Wno-register -fsyntax-only' scram build -k -j 32 COMPILER='llvm compile'

See details on the summary page.

- converted legacy modules to one::
- added needed esConsumes calls
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35672/25961

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #35672 was updated. @jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9b65d8/19634/summary.html
COMMIT: 7c571eb
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-14-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35672/19634/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2796107
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2796079
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 39 files compared)
  • Checked 169 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 15, 2021

+reconstruction

for #35672 7c571eb

  • code changes are in line with the PR description, affecting only MagneticField/Engine/test. Since the analyzer code here is cout-based, a switch to edm::one looks reasonable
  • jenkins tests pass

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Oct 16, 2021

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants