-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change to the new method of using writeOneIOV
in PPSAssociationCuts
#35669
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35669/25956
|
A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @ggovi, @tvami, @malbouis, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild , please test |
@smuzaffar "Unable to find CMSSW IB for master." Is this a known issue? |
please test |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35669/25970
|
Pull request #35669 was updated. @ggovi, @malbouis, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3ab1ae/19641/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummaryThe workflows 1001.0 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+db
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1
|
PR description:
Change to the new method of using
writeOneIOV
inPPSAssociationCuts
Resolves #35667
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A