SciLayer8 4mm sipm rad max added

[suhokimHEP]

PR description:

<For GeometryD86, it's adding the 4mm sipm for HGCal scintillator tiles in Layer8 (instead of 2mm)-->

PR validation:

<SimCalorimetry/HGCalSimAlgos/test/hgchebacksignalscaler_cfg.py with sipmMap argument>

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist:

• verify that the PR is really intended for the chosen branch
• verify that changes follow CMS Naming, Coding, And Style Rules
• verify that the PR passes the basic test procedure suggested in the CMSSW PR instructions

[cmsbuild]

@suhokimHEP, CMSSW_12_1_X branch is closed for direct updates. cms-bot is going to move this PR to master branch.
In future, please use cmssw master branch to submit your changes.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35500/25682

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @suhokimHEP for master.

It involves the following packages:

• SimCalorimetry/HGCalSimProducers (upgrade, simulation)

@cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @civanch, @srimanob, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@vandreev11, @sethzenz, @bsunanda, @rovere, @lgray, @cseez, @apsallid, @pfs, @hatakeyamak this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[civanch]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2f6629/19312/summary.html
COMMIT: 30b8607
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-30-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35500/19312/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3211080
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211058
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 39 files compared)
• Checked 169 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[srimanob]

@cmsbuild please test workflow 38634.0

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-2f6629/19323/summary.html
COMMIT: 30b8607
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-30-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35500/19323/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-2f6629/38634.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D86+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3211080
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3211058
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 39 files compared)
• Checked 169 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[civanch]

+1

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

This PR updates the mapping of sipm size as title said. The PR test run fine.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[qliphy]

+1