-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HGCAL trigger] Migrate to esConsumes #35459
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35459/25615
|
Thanks! |
A new Pull Request was created by @jbsauvan (Jean-Baptiste Sauvan) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @cecilecaillol, @rekovic can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cab02a/19216/summary.html CMS StaticAnalyzer warnings: There are 2 EventSetupRecord::get warnings. See https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cab02a/19216/llvm-analysis/esrget-sa.txt for details. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Seems that I forgot to migrate There is still a deprecated call of |
That call needs to be eventually migrated as well. Is the code in |
Unfortunately I cannot tell as I'm not responsible of this part (which is why I didn't want to modify the code there). Maybe @cecilecaillol and @rekovic know who in the L1T group could have a look. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35459/25638
|
Pull request #35459 was updated. @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @cecilecaillol, @rekovic can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cab02a/19252/summary.html CMS StaticAnalyzer warnings: There are 1 EventSetupRecord::get warnings. See https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cab02a/19252/llvm-analysis/esrget-sa.txt for details. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
No, the code in L1Trigger/L1CaloTrigger/test is not run as part of unit tests. |
@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 Could you please review and sign? Thanks! |
+upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
L1Trigger/L1THGCal
andL1Trigger/L1THGCalUtilities
PR validation:
Private tests in
L1Trigger/L1THGCalUtilities/test
:Tested D49, D60 and D68 workflows