-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use esConsumes in TSGFromL2Muon #35327
Conversation
Also simplified some of the logic.
Removed unneeded member data as well
Also removed unused code
The function can ony be called in the constructor.
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35327/25370 ERROR: Build errors found during clang-tidy run.
|
183caf9
to
0db8feb
Compare
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35327/25371
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
0db8feb
to
7c96d7e
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35327/25372
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @lveldere, @sbein, @ssekmen, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @jpata can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e3f998/18724/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+reconstruction
|
Looks like the changes in FastSimulation/* are physics-innocuous. I was a bit surprised by the fairly large chunk of code just removed. It seems like in the old master, theMeasTracker was not used? I see the same change was made in the FullSim version (RecoMuon/*). Looks fine. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
PR validation:
Code compiles.