Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve math in broken-line fit [12.0.x] #35313

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2021

Conversation

fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor

@fwyzard fwyzard commented Sep 16, 2021

PR description:

Backport #35128 to CMSSW 12.0.x.

PR validation:

These changes fix the crash observed during CRuZeT run 344679.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Backport of #35128

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Sep 16, 2021

backport #35128

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Sep 16, 2021

type bugfix

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the CMSSW_12_0_X milestone Sep 16, 2021
@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Sep 16, 2021

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 16, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard (Andrea Bocci) for CMSSW_12_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoPixelVertexing/PixelTrackFitting (reconstruction)

@jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @mmusich, @mtosi, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1cbcd7/18678/summary.html
COMMIT: 477e2c8
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-09-16-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35313/18678/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2805 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2998564
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 4120
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2994422
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 38 workflows

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Sep 17, 2021

Reco comparison results: 2805 differences found in the comparisons

these are all in 11634.911 DD4HEP, which has repeatability issues

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Sep 17, 2021

+reconstruction

for #35313 477e2c8

  • code changes are the same as in the master PR improve math in broken-line fit #35128 , which was merged for about 2 weeks already ==> the backport is correct
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show no relevant differences

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77 the description of the master version of this PR says "Expect some negligible differences (present even in the unit test)".
They are just possible numerical-level differences, as far as I understand: does it comply with the no-change rule that we must apply now for 12_0_X, for which productions have started already?

@fwyzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

fwyzard commented Sep 17, 2021

@perrotta I don't think the Patatrack pixel tracking is used anywhere in production, yet.
It's enabled only by the .501, .502, .505 and .506 workflows.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@perrotta I don't think the Patatrack pixel tracking is used anywhere in production, yet.
It's enabled only by the .501, .502, .505 and .506 workflows.

Good point :-)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 7920ff8 into cms-sw:CMSSW_12_0_X Sep 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants