-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing collection for producing unprefirable bit in NANO (master) #35294
Fixing collection for producing unprefirable bit in NANO (master) #35294
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35294/25303
|
A new Pull Request was created by @lathomas for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelVals
RelVals-INPUT
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35294/25318
|
Pull request #35294 was updated. @cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8fa724/18658/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
kind ping @gouskos @mariadalfonso. We then need a backport to 106X, would appreciate if someone else can take care of it ! |
Kind ping. @mariadalfonso @gouskos |
please test (re-running with recent release, ready to merge) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8fa724/20682/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+xpog |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
The L1 unprefirable bit ("L1_UnprefireableEvent") is currently always false in NANOAOD. This is found to be due to the wrong input collection being provided to the dedicated producer.
This PR corrects this.
PR validation:
Ran on a few unprefirable data events previously identified and checked that the boolean is now true.
Checked that MC is not affected.