Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TkDQM: Fix tracker maps for run3 #34966

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 30, 2021

Conversation

sroychow
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This PR is aimed at resolving #34607 . The reading capability of a TDirectory based ROOT file is enabled in the LegacyIOHelper and that is used by the SiStripOfflineDQM module. In addition, this PR adds a unit test for the offline TkMap creation.
Thanks to @mmusich for debugging several aspects of the changes. Some bug fixes for some of the TkMaps are expected which can come as a separate PR later.

PR validation:

The updates have been tested privately and Tracker Maps are getting produced with DQM harvested root file as an input.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Backport will be done for 11_3 and 12_0.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34966/24802

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @sroychow (Suvankar Roy Chowdhury) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQM/SiStripMonitorClient (dqm)
  • DQMServices/Core (dqm)

@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@arossi83, @barvic, @hdelanno, @sroychow, @fioriNTU, @jandrea, @idebruyn, @threus, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@sroychow
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Aug 20, 2021

type bug-fix

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34966/24806

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #34966 was updated. @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Aug 20, 2021

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34966/24917

  • This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Aug 27, 2021

@cmsbuild, please test

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Aug 27, 2021

urgent

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #34966 was updated. @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @jfernan2, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-cf236d/18092/summary.html
COMMIT: 0f15cfc
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-27-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/34966/18092/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3000352
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 11
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3000318
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Aug 30, 2021

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants