-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrate RPCRecHitProducer to esConsumes() #34945
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34945/24768
|
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
setup.get<RPCMaskedStripsRcd>().get(readoutMaskedStrips); | ||
const RPCMaskedStrips* tmp_obj = readoutMaskedStrips.product(); | ||
theRPCMaskedStripsObj->MaskVec = tmp_obj->MaskVec; | ||
delete tmp_obj; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder how this piece has ever worked, because the delete
should lead two double-delete as framework owns the object pointed-to by ESHandle
(and ESHandle::product()
).
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8fb5c8/17881/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Now there are merge conflicts, assuming they are caused by #34919 I need to wait for the next IB. |
407bfd2
to
3740642
Compare
Rebased on top of CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-20-2300 |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34945/24810 ERROR: Build errors found during clang-tidy run.
|
3740642
to
f546286
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34945/24811
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8fb5c8/17942/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+reconstruction for #34945 f546286
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Part of #31061.
PR validation:
Code compiles.