-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Tracker Alignment] Miscellaneous fixes in Alignment/OfflineValidation
all-in-one tool
#34876
[Tracker Alignment] Miscellaneous fixes in Alignment/OfflineValidation
all-in-one tool
#34876
Conversation
Alignment/OfflineValidation
all-in-one tool
type bug-fix |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34876/24679
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @pohsun, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
-1 Failed Tests: Build ClangBuild The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: BuildI found compilation error when building: >> Compiling /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/CondDBImport.cc >> Compiling /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/CondDBTools.cc >> Compiling /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/PayloadInspector.cc >> Compiling /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/Utilities.cc /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/CondDBTools.cc: In function 'size_t cond::persistency::importIovs(const string&, cond::persistency::Session&, const string&, cond::persistency::Session&, cond::Time_t, cond::Time_t, const string&, const string&, bool, bool, bool)': /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/CondDBTools.cc:97:12: error: 'set' is not a member of 'std' 97 | std::set pids; | ^~~ /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/CondDBTools.cc:4:1: note: 'std::set' is defined in header ''; did you forget to '#include '? 3 | #include "CondCore/CondDB/interface/ConnectionPool.h" +++ |+#include Clang BuildI found compilation error while trying to compile with clang. Command used:
>> Compiling /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/CondDBFetch.cc >> Compiling /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/CondDBImport.cc >> Compiling /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/CondDBTools.cc >> Compiling /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/PayloadInspector.cc >> Compiling /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/Utilities.cc /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/CondDBTools.cc:97:26: error: expected '(' for function-style cast or type construction std::set pids; ~~~~~~~~~~^ /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-12-2300/src/CondCore/Utilities/src/CondDBTools.cc:97:12: error: no member named 'set' in namespace 'std' std::set pids; ~~~~~^ |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13f6c2/17777/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
The goal of this PR is to fix some miscelleanous mistakes in the all-in-one template configurations introduced since the last alignment campaigns (commit db6ca68).
I profit of the PR to enhance the unit test to check at compilation time the soundness of the python configuration produced by the test themselves (commit 2543ada).
PR validation:
Run the
Alignment/OfflineValidation
unit tests viascram b runtests
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Not a backport but will be backported to production cycles.