Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MagneticField] Move public headers to interface directory #34763

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2021
Merged

[MagneticField] Move public headers to interface directory #34763

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2021

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@smuzaffar smuzaffar commented Aug 4, 2021

As reported in #34718 , this PR moves headers in interface directory for MagneticField

      2 src/MagneticField/Layers/src/MagBinFinders.h

cleanup unnecessary include of

      1 src/MagneticField/ParametrizedEngine/src/OAEParametrizedMagneticField.h

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34763/24428

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/Skimming (pdmv)
  • MagneticField/Layers (reconstruction)
  • MagneticField/VolumeBasedEngine (reconstruction)

@perrotta, @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @kskovpen, @slava77, @jpata can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @namapane, @fabiocos this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

smuzaffar commented Aug 4, 2021

@namapane , sorry the PR description was wrong . I have updated it, yes MagneticField/ParametrizedEngine/src/OAEParametrizedMagneticField.h remains in the src directory. There was an unnecessary include of it which I have cleaned up. The MagneticField/Layers/src/MagBinFinders.h is actually used by other package so that should go in to interface directory.

@namapane
Copy link
Contributor

namapane commented Aug 4, 2021

Perfect, thanks @smuzaffar for the clarification!

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 4, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3c6c68/17532/summary.html
COMMIT: c287453
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-08-03-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/34763/17532/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2998564
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2998535
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 38 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 5, 2021

+reconstruction

for #34763 c287453

  • code changes are technical, in line with the PR description
  • jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show no (relevant) differences

@bbilin
Copy link
Contributor

bbilin commented Aug 5, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Aug 5, 2021

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Aug 5, 2021

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants