-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduce conddb
script unit tests
#34392
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34392/23787
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages: CondCore/Utilities (db) @ggovi, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-892eb1/16590/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
10ec355
to
e2d1f46
Compare
e2d1f46
to
0daa900
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34392/23830
|
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test EcalDAQ_O2O_test had ERRORS ---> test EcalDCS_O2O_test had ERRORS ---> test EcalLaser_O2O_test had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
test parameters: |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-892eb1/17045/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Can we please merge this before the release gets broken in 10,000 other ways? Thanks |
Having just waited 2 weeks for a simple db PR (whose absence broke the second round of your PR tests), I guess this PR is still too young to be signed:)
… On Jul 21, 2021, at 12:42 PM, Marco Musich ***@***.***> wrote:
Can we please merge this before the release gets broken in 10,000 other ways? Thanks
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @perrotta (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This is inspired from #34378.
In commit 0daa900 a unit test to check basic functionalities of the
conddb
script is added.In commit 2927fc9 a protection for
conddb diffGlobalTagsAtRun
is added, in order not go in error if it's run=1 (that's MC)PR validation:
The newly introduced unit test passes:
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
N/A