-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
modified the various (ES)producers for express stream and HLT #34295
modified the various (ES)producers for express stream and HLT #34295
Conversation
…beamspot use for Run3
@mtosi @mmusich @francescobrivio you may want to check this one |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34295/23614
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
fallBackToDB = true; | ||
}else{ | ||
// translate from BeamSpotObjects to reco::BeamSpot | ||
reco::BeamSpot::Point apoint(spotDB.GetX(), spotDB.GetY(), spotDB.GetZ()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shouldn't also this mode support the frame conversion?
See:
cmssw/RecoVertex/BeamSpotProducer/plugins/BeamSpotOnlineProducer.cc
Lines 91 to 93 in 9519f09
double f = 1.; | |
if (changeFrame_) | |
f = -1.; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was unsure about this, if you think it is the proper thing to do I can do that. I did not know what this changeFrame was used for
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
well, if you don't do it, it won't reproduce the previous behaviour, so I think it should be added.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
|
||
), | ||
connect = cms.string('oracle://cms_orcon_prod/CMS_CONDITIONS') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this in general won't work unless you have the appropriate credentials.
For a test can't you use frontier
instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
checking now
code-checks |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34295/23619
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34295/23620
|
A new Pull Request was created by @gennai (simone gennai) for master. It involves the following packages: RecoVertex/BeamSpotProducer @perrotta, @malbouis, @yuanchao, @tlampen, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @jpata, @pohsun, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
Co-authored-by: Joosep Pata <[email protected]>
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34295/23655
|
test parameters:
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-097fed/16444/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+alca |
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
I have modified the Online BS Producers to take the values from the transient record produced in the related ESProducer.
This is intended for HLT and express stream reconstruction for Run3. There is a new parameter that if set to False, it would revert back to Run2 code.
A second PR on a ERA modifier configuration will follow.
PR validation:
I have checked the behavior of the code using the test_scalers.py script modified accordingly