-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed materials discrepancies between DDD and DD4hep: remove duplicate definitions of Phase 1 materials (FPix_CFSkin and cie) #33257
Conversation
…). Same name but different composition in second definition. This resulted in discrepancies in the DDD <-> DD4hep materials comparison: in DDD the first definition was taken, in DD4hep the second. Chose the composition contaning H and O in addition to C (a carbon fiber with C only does not seem realistic).
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33257/21735
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ghugo83 for master. It involves the following packages: Geometry/TrackerCommonData @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
@ghugo83 , I think, that we understand this probably correct would be using compound material both in DDD and DD4Hep. Because Run-3 geometry is not yet frozen we can do this. Also you are right making new version of the material file. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d0fc19/13733/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
How do we proceed to include this file, is it fine to modify T3? |
Alright, just added it to T3. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33257/21740
|
Pull request #33257 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @kpedro88 can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d0fc19/13749/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
@srimanob, please, have a look |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
A discrepancy in the DDD <-> DD4hep materials comparison was stemming from duplicate definitions of FPix_CFSkin (and FPix_CFSkin_OuterOuterRing, etc...).
With DDD the first definition was considered, in DD4hep the second.
Chose the composition containing H and O in addition to C (a carbon fiber with C only does not seem realistic to manufacture anyway).
Not sure how to proceed in terms of 2021 scenarios though, as this is a small fix. Created the v3 version.