-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extension of electron matching in nanoAOD #32966
Extension of electron matching in nanoAOD #32966
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32966/21201
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32966/21202
|
A new Pull Request was created by @sscruz for master. It involves the following packages: PhysicsTools/HepMCCandAlgos @cmsbuild, @santocch, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6df655/13026/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test runtestPhysicsToolsNanoAOD had ERRORS RelVals
RelVals-INPUT
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6df655/13709/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
can you upload this large stat validation in the description? |
unassign analysis |
sure, sorry for the late reply. this is what I have: |
+xpog |
merge |
@sscruz note that we need to safeguard the current ongoing v8 production in 10_6_X |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
Electron matching to MC truth has some inefficiency due to FSR. This PR extends the matching to recover such cases, by adding the possibility that electrons can be matched to gendressed particles. This issue has been reported here:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/962278/contributions/4060711/attachments/2136665/3599026/electron_matching_nano_nov4.pdf
and further discussed here:
cms-nanoAOD#552
The electron matching is performed as follows: