-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pr113x L1T Fractional Prescales implemented with Global Trigger #32741
Pr113x L1T Fractional Prescales implemented with Global Trigger #32741
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-32741/20892
|
A new Pull Request was created by @rekovic for master. It involves the following packages: CommonTools/TriggerUtils @cmsbuild, @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @ahmad3213, @jmduarte, @Martin-Grunewald, @rekovic, @jfernan2, @fwyzard, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals RelVals-INPUT AddOn Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test runtestPhysicsToolsPatAlgos had ERRORS RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
AddOn Tests
Expand to see more addon errors ... |
I've encountered a problem in trying to prepare the GTs and I need advice from @cms-sw/hlt-l2 regarding how to proceed. Some of the addOnTests use the Should the |
Can one make compatible GTs by re-serialising the record with the different boost? |
The addOnTests are to test that everything is in working order at PR test time. They are supposed to reflect any physics/MC production in/for that release. |
IOW, if the GTs can be updated (without changing the physics content), then this should be OK and also future proof. |
+1 |
@cms-sw/hlt-l2 do you have further comments? |
There is still a flag 'tests-rejected' |
please test |
Rerun tests.... |
This PR was successfully tested with PR #32758 but apparently the bot was changed recently so that when two PRs are tested together, notifications are sent only to the PR in which the test command was issued, and similarly for the status labels. I don't know if this was a design decision or if it is a bug. @smuzaffar Could you comment? |
please test with #32758 |
@christopheralanwest , it is design decision. Each PR needs to be tested explicitly |
please test with #32758 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a8640e/12634/summary.html Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
This PR likely broke two unit tests in |
PR description:
Master branch PR of the 11_2_X PR #32377 which is needed for MWGR Feb 2021.
11_3_X: Use of fractional prescales in uGT emulator, by switching from legacy (int based) to new (double based) prescales. The new Conditions format is available in CondDB as
L1TGlobalPrescalesVetosFractRcd
, in theL1TGlobalPrescalesVetosFract_Stage2_v2_hlt
tag.Supplemented by changes in
HLTrigger/HLTcore
packagePR validation:
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Before submitting your pull requests, make sure you followed this checklist: