Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[11.1.X] use smart pointers in SiStripClassToMonitorCondData #31923

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Oct 23, 2020

backport of #31916

PR description:

While investigating a crash reported in the SiStrip online client during the most recent MWGR, I stumbled upon this class.
Raw pointers can become smart pointers, for extra safety.

PR validation:

Run the SiStrip Online client:

cmsrel CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-22-2300
cd CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-22-2300/src/
cmsenv
git cms-addpkg DQM/Integration
# edit the sistrip_dqm_sourceclient-live_cfg.py file not to be in live mode
scramv1 b -j 8
voms-proxy-init -voms cms
mkdir upload
cmsRun DQM/Integration/python/clients/sistrip_dqm_sourceclient-live_cfg.py dataset=/ExpressCosmics/Commissioning2020-Express-v1/FEVT runNumber=337881
cmsRun DQM/Integration/python/clients/sistrip_dqm_sourceclient-live_cfg.py dataset=/ExpressCosmics/Commissioning2020-Express-v1/FEVT runNumber=337892
cmsRun DQM/Integration/python/clients/sistrip_dqm_sourceclient-live_cfg.py dataset=/ExpressCosmics/Commissioning2020-Express-v1/FEVT runNumber=337903 

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Not a backport, no backport is needed.

cc:
@sroychow @arossi83

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 23, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_11_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/SiStripMonitorSummary

@andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @ErnestaP, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@arossi83, @hdelanno, @sroychow, @fioriNTU, @jandrea, @idebruyn, @threus, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 23, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 6567200
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1110b4/10245/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-10-23-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1110b4/10245/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 36
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2784776
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2784725
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 50
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 35 files compared)
  • Checked 152 log files, 16 edm output root files, 36 DQM output files

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_11_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Oct 24, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 962ded4 into cms-sw:CMSSW_11_1_X Oct 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants