-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[10_6_X] DDXv2 and BTV changes in Nano #31618, #31786 #31847
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @andrzejnovak (Andrzej Novak) for CMSSW_10_6_X. It involves the following packages: PhysicsTools/NanoAOD @cmsbuild, @santocch, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
this backport PR seems take care only of the previously made nano. but not of the remini-UL and nano that come from there. In master #31618 you have modifications in PhysicsTools/PatAlgos/python/slimming/applyDeepBtagging_cff.py |
@mariadalfonso Ok so that was not clear to me. The 106 mini should by default use DDX v2? I thought this was not desirable since there already exists 106 mini which does not contain the V2. |
@andrzejnovak That's why we need to use modifiers. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
-1 Tested at: d1100f0 CMSSW: CMSSW_10_6_X_2020-10-21-1100 I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: Build
I found compilation warning when building: See details on the summary page. |
Comparison not run due to Build errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
Compiling src/PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nano_cff.py ... |
d1100f0
to
34e4288
Compare
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+xpog Changes inline with master:
Additionally:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_6_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_11_2_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Backport of #31618, #31786