-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PPS: relative alignment #31629
PPS: relative alignment #31629
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31629/18699
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31629/18700
|
A new Pull Request was created by @jan-kaspar for master. It involves the following packages: CalibPPS/AlignmentRelative The following packages do not have a category, yet: CalibPPS/AlignmentRelative @perrotta, @yuanchao, @slava77, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @jpata, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
<ioread sourceClass="TotemRPUVPattern" version="[2]" targetClass="TotemRPUVPattern" source="TotemRPUVPattern::ProjectionType projection" target="projection_"> | ||
<![CDATA[projection_ = onfile.projection;]]> | ||
</ioread> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is already in the master.
@jan-kaspar please review the commits and remove this file.
Thank you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for pointing this out. I will address this in the next days together with the invalid-state files.
dfee1a6
to
629abfe
Compare
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
I've just pushed the code with cleaned up history. For the change in CondFormats/PPSObjects, here's a little before-after comparison showing that no change is generated in PPS reco of Run2 data. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31629/18747
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31629/19584
|
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
|
+1 |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Following the discussion in the AlCaDB meeting on 28 Sep this PR contains implementation of the "relative" alignment of PPS. Integration of the "global" part is foreseen soon.
For more details please refer to the README file in "CalibPPS/AlignmentRelative".
PR validation:
Various tests are included in the test directory.