Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PPS: relative alignment #31629

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Nov 6, 2020

Conversation

jan-kaspar
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Following the discussion in the AlCaDB meeting on 28 Sep this PR contains implementation of the "relative" alignment of PPS. Integration of the "global" part is foreseen soon.

For more details please refer to the README file in "CalibPPS/AlignmentRelative".

PR validation:

Various tests are included in the test directory.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31629/18699

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31629/18700

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @jan-kaspar for master.

It involves the following packages:

CalibPPS/AlignmentRelative
CondFormats/PPSObjects
DataFormats/CTPPSReco

The following packages do not have a category, yet:

CalibPPS/AlignmentRelative
Please create a PR for https://github.com/cms-sw/cms-bot/blob/master/categories_map.py to assign category

@perrotta, @yuanchao, @slava77, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @jpata, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@forthommel, @rovere, @mmusich, @seemasharmafnal, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

Comment on lines 43 to 45
<ioread sourceClass="TotemRPUVPattern" version="[2]" targetClass="TotemRPUVPattern" source="TotemRPUVPattern::ProjectionType projection" target="projection_">
<![CDATA[projection_ = onfile.projection;]]>
</ioread>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is already in the master.
@jan-kaspar please review the commits and remove this file.
Thank you.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for pointing this out. I will address this in the next days together with the invalid-state files.

@jan-kaspar jan-kaspar force-pushed the ctpps_relative_alignment_11_2_0 branch from dfee1a6 to 629abfe Compare October 2, 2020 12:38
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 2, 2020

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@jan-kaspar
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've just pushed the code with cleaned up history.

For the change in CondFormats/PPSObjects, here's a little before-after comparison showing that no change is generated in PPS reco of Run2 data.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 2, 2020

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31629/18747

  • This PR adds an extra 80KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 5, 2020

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 5, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-31629/19584

  • This PR adds an extra 152KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 5, 2020

Pull request #31629 was updated. @yuanchao, @christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @pohsun can you please check and sign again.

@christopheralanwest
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 5, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 5, 2020

+1
Tested at: 52ded92
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-65a3e0/10536/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-11-05-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 5, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 5, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-65a3e0/10536/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2544144
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2544115
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@yuanchao
Copy link
Contributor

yuanchao commented Nov 6, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 6, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@silviodonato silviodonato merged commit 5a81488 into cms-sw:master Nov 6, 2020
@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@jan-kaspar jan-kaspar deleted the ctpps_relative_alignment_11_2_0 branch December 4, 2020 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants