Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update tau anti electron discriminators in RECO and MiniAOD (10_6_X) #31065
Update tau anti electron discriminators in RECO and MiniAOD (10_6_X) #31065
Changes from 6 commits
601a5ff
f6c56da
e14ec0e
e64bca6
ef784dd
7cfdeaa
c554314
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is not 1:1 backport
the labelling of 2015 and 2018 is done differently between here and master.
is this intended ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am surprised as I think it is OK, but let me check - a bug is not excluded. I will back to it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I checked it again and it is correct as it is. Difference wrt master is caused by the fact that here in "default workflows", i.e. other than
run2_miniAOD_devel
, it is expected that anti-e tauIDs 2015 are not labeled by year in patTaus, while 2018 ones are rerun as a part of nanoAOD sequences and labelled by 2018 in patTaus. The order is swapped in case ofrun2_miniAOD_devel
with 106X as well as in default workflows with master.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mbluj
what about to recompute 'idAntiEleDeadECal' for the old version of mini input ?
we have done in master and for the ID below you recompute all such that you get always filled with something
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my understanding in
master
it is desirable to have "latest and greatest" nanoAOD content regardless of input miniAOD / era, while for older release series nanoAOD content is frozen with old eras to allow reproducibility (no changing policy as for other data-tiers). This implementation follows above reasoning. It can be however changed to be closer to master if it is expected behavior.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for reco and miniAOD holds what you said " (no changing policy as for other data-tiers)"
But nanoAOD are a simple ntuplizer.
We want to have the fix and latest greatest variable compatible with the input dataset and the corrections/calibration you have available for the analysis. So we can update the content as we update the pre-releases.
So worth to add the idAntiEleDeadECal for the EOY and UL106v1.
Also this is a new variable, is someone want to put together with other ntuples where you didn't have one can just ignore.
@peruzzim