Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Basic Rivet tests #28873

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2020
Merged

Basic Rivet tests #28873

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2020

Conversation

mseidel42
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Adding basic tests to check Rivet correct functioning:

  • List analyses and check for a specific one
  • Generate events and run Rivet within CMSSW

PR validation:

Tests function as expected:

===== Test "test-rivet-list" ====
MC_GENERIC                  Generic MC testing analysis

---> test test-rivet-list succeeded
 
^^^^ End Test test-rivet-list ^^^^
Package GeneratorInterface/RivetInterface: Running test test-rivet-run
 
===== Test "test-rivet-run" ====
[CMSSW output]

---> test test-rivet-run succeeded
 
^^^^ End Test test-rivet-run ^^^^
>> Tests for package GeneratorInterface/RivetInterface ran.
>> Test sequence completed for CMSSW CMSSW_11_1_0_pre2
scram build runtests  21.32s user 10.35s system 86% cpu 36.726 total

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 5, 2020

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 5, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28873/13642

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 5, 2020

A new Pull Request was created by @intrepid42 (Markus Seidel) for master.

It involves the following packages:

GeneratorInterface/RivetInterface

@SiewYan, @efeyazgan, @mkirsano, @cmsbuild, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez, @qliphy can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@alberto-sanchez, @agrohsje, @mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Feb 6, 2020

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 6, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/4524/console Started: 2020/02/06 07:27

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
#!/bin/sh
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please use #!/bin/sh -e so that script exits at first error.

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
#!/bin/sh
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please use #!/bin/sh -e so that script exits at first error.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 6, 2020

+1
Tested at: 4e1d19e
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4b307b/4524/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-02-05-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 6, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 6, 2020

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 6, 2020

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28873/13647

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 6, 2020

Pull request #28873 was updated. @SiewYan, @efeyazgan, @mkirsano, @cmsbuild, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez, @qliphy can you please check and sign again.

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Feb 6, 2020

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 6, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/4528/console Started: 2020/02/06 09:59

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 6, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4b307b/4524/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2698043
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2697696
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 346
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 6, 2020

+1
Tested at: 08b90ac
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4b307b/4528/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2020-02-05-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 6, 2020

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 6, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4b307b/4528/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2698043
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2697696
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 346
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Feb 6, 2020

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 6, 2020

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @silviodonato, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mseidel42
Copy link
Contributor Author

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants