Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reduce dependencies on RecoEgamma and requirements for RecoEgamma #28684

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 15, 2020
Merged

Reduce dependencies on RecoEgamma and requirements for RecoEgamma #28684

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 15, 2020

Conversation

guitargeek
Copy link
Contributor

@guitargeek guitargeek commented Dec 27, 2019

PR description:

To make cmssw a bit more modular, I looked at the RecoEgamma packages and tried to remove all unused requirements. At the same time, I looked at the spots where other parts of cmssw depend on RecoEgamma and tried to remove these dependencies where possible. The ElectronIdentification and PhotonIdentification packages got special attention, and all sources in these libraries which are only used for plugins were moved into the plugins directory to make this more explicit.

PR validation:

CMSSW compiles and local matrix tests pass.

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:

No backport intended.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-28684/13255

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @guitargeek (Jonas Rembser) for master.

It involves the following packages:

CommonTools/RecoUtils
Configuration/Skimming
DQM/Physics
DQM/TrackingMonitorSource
DQMOffline/EGamma
DQMOffline/Ecal
DQMOffline/Trigger
ElectroWeakAnalysis/WENu
HLTrigger/Egamma
L1Trigger/L1TNtuples
RecoBTag/SoftLepton
RecoEcal/EgammaClusterAlgos
RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronAlgos
RecoEgamma/EgammaElectronProducers
RecoEgamma/EgammaIsolationAlgos
RecoEgamma/EgammaPhotonAlgos
RecoEgamma/EgammaPhotonProducers
RecoEgamma/ElectronIdentification
RecoEgamma/Examples
RecoEgamma/PhotonIdentification
RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer
RecoParticleFlow/PFTracking
TrackingTools/TrajectoryState
Validation/RecoEgamma

@perrotta, @kmaeshima, @benkrikler, @cmsbuild, @chayanit, @zhenhu, @fwyzard, @schneiml, @andrius-k, @pgunnell, @rekovic, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU, @Martin-Grunewald, @slava77, @santocch can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @felicepantaleo, @jainshilpi, @hatakeyamak, @emilbols, @argiro, @HeinerTholen, @fioriNTU, @thomreis, @abbiendi, @varuns23, @seemasharmafnal, @mmarionncern, @smoortga, @hdelanno, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @makortel, @threus, @acaudron, @jhgoh, @lgray, @missirol, @HuguesBrun, @cericeci, @ferencek, @trocino, @rociovilar, @Sam-Harper, @cbernet, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @bellan, @jandrea, @idebruyn, @ebrondol, @mtosi, @dgulhan, @kreczko, @Martin-Grunewald, @battibass, @Fedespring, @calderona, @mverzett, @sobhatta, @folguera, @afiqaize, @gpetruc, @andrzejnovak, @pvmulder, @bachtis this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos, @silviodonato you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 27, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/4105/console Started: 2019/12/27 15:48

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 1fdd8e2
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ef0eba/4105/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_1_X_2019-12-26-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ef0eba/4105/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2815765
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2815417
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 346
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ef0eba/4193/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2696324
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2695977
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 346
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
  • Checked 147 log files, 16 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1
No dqm changes

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@tocheng
Copy link
Contributor

tocheng commented Jan 11, 2020

+1

@chayanit
Copy link

+1

@santocch
Copy link

+1

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

Just to avoid having to rebase once more:

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@silviodonato
Copy link
Contributor

merge
@rekovic this PR changes only one line of L1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants