Fix autoCondPhase2.py for python 3

[Dr15Jones]

PR description:

Python 3 dicts do not have iteritems method.

PR validation:

Using CMSSW_11_0_DEVEL_X_2019-08-18-2300 ran runTheMatrix.py -l 1.0 which now works (was failing in the IBs).

[cmsbuild]

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

[Dr15Jones]

please test

[Dr15Jones]

@davidlange6 this should fix most of the python 3 failures seen in the DEVEL IB.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27810/11518

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/AlCa/python/autoCondPhase2.py modified in PR(s): python3 compatibility change in autoCondPhase2.py #27805

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/2086/console Started: 2019/08/20 16:38

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/AlCa

@christopheralanwest, @tocheng, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @tlampen, @pohsun can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald, @mmusich, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mmusich]

isn't this the very same of #27805?

[davidlange6]

Right - i randomly made the same pr earlier today:)

…

On Aug 20, 2019, at 4:33 PM, Chris Jones ***@***.***> wrote: @davidlange6 this should fix most of the python 3 failures seen in the DEVEL IB. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[makortel]

There is also #27781 trying to fix the same issue...

[davidlange6]

ha - indeed - i would proposed using this one or mine rather than #27781.

…

On Aug 20, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Matti Kortelainen ***@***.***> wrote: There is also #27781 trying to fix the same issue... — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 106e0f0
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8b9cc1/2086/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8b9cc1/2086/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 34
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2939508
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2939166
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 341
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 33 files compared)
• Checked 142 log files, 14 edm output root files, 34 DQM output files

[pohsun]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[Dr15Jones]

This is a duplicate of #27805