-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Phase2-hgx205 Add a new scenario for HGCal V11 geometry version #27555
Conversation
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-27555/10948
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Eras @cmsbuild, @benkrikler, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @civanch, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @pgunnell, @rekovic, @franzoni, @kpedro88, @zhenhu, @prebello, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
please abort |
Jenkins tests are aborted. |
please test workflow 22034.0 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+upgrade |
+operations the update of Eras and geometry configurations is coherent with the purpose of the PR and appears correct |
@rekovic the update of the L1 configuration looks a minimal update of the existing one, with a protection for the HGcal v11. Please check and sign it, I would like to merge this PR asap |
+1 I don't seem any problem with it |
@rekovic @benkrikler please check and sign |
+1 |
merge |
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ def runSelected(opt): | |||
20034.0, #2026D35 ttbar (MTD TDR baseline) | |||
20434.0, #2026D41 ttbar (L1T TDR baseline) | |||
21234.0, #2026D44 (exercise HF nose) | |||
22034.0, #2026D46 ttbar (exercise V11 HGCal) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kpedro88
can we consolidate some of the exercise this and that workflows some time soon?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we were going to remove one right now, it would probably be D35. At some point, D44 will be replaced with a new version of the HF nose based on D46. But with different geometries that imply code changes, I am reluctant to remove them from regular tests, because things easily break (as we have seen in the past). I agree that we should try not to exceed the current number of workflows (4) if possible.
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Calorimeters: | |||
* C4: HGCal (v9) + Phase2 HCAL and EB | |||
* C6: HGCal (v9) + HFNose + Phase2 HCAL and EB | |||
* C8: HGCal (v10 post TDR HGCal Geometry) + Phase2 HCAL and EB + Tracker cables in calorimeter region | |||
* C9: HGCal (v11 post TDR HGCal Geometry same as V8 + corner centering for HE part) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
did it really mean to say "same as V8" (C3 defined in 2016), or was it supposed to say "same as C8"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it should be C8. @bsunanda ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes it should be C8 - I shall correct this when I make the new PR with updated HGCal with HFNose
PR description:
Add a new scenario 2026D46 with V11 geometry version of HGCal. Also a new workflow 22034 is worked out
PR validation:
Tested with the new workflow
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR:
No back porting is needed