-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Running code-format for dqm #26714
Running code-format for dqm #26714
Conversation
please test |
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26714/9700
|
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @cmsbuild for master. It involves the following packages: DQM/EcalMonitorDbModule @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
-1 Tested at: f27611d You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: Build
I found compilation warning when building: See details on the summary page. |
Comparison not run due to Build errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
Looks like gcc is not happy with clang-format changes. I have opened a issue with clang-format team (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41807 ) . For now I propose that we fix this manually
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-26714/9706
|
Pull request #26714 was updated. @andrius-k, @kmaeshima, @schneiml, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @fioriNTU can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
@fabiocos , looks like gcc is not happy with clang-format changes. I have opened a issue with clang-format team (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41807 ) . For now I propose that we fix this manually 1b332fd |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
1 similar comment
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@smuzaffar ok, that was easily caught by the compiler, I quickly scrolled the diff report and did not see anything else obviously weird |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
Applying code-format for CMSSW category dqm.
See the build logs here https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/GitHub-refactor-cmssw-module/197//console
cms-bot has successfully run the following:
Fixes the code-formats suggested by #26628 (see #26686)