-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
separate baseDataSetRelease values for fastsim 2017 #25626
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for CMSSW_10_2_X. It involves the following packages: Configuration/PyReleaseValidation @pgunnell, @zhenhu, @prebello, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test workflow 25400.17,250399.0,250400.17,250402.17,250405.17,250406.17,250407.17,250408.17,250409.17 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: 55227c1 You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: RelVals
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows: runTheMatrix-results/250400.17_ZEE_13+FS_ZEE_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_ZEE_13+FS_ZEE_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log250402.17 step1 runTheMatrix-results/250402.17_TTbar_13+FS_TTbar_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_TTbar_13+FS_TTbar_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log250406.17 step1 runTheMatrix-results/250406.17_ZMM_13+FS_ZMM_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_ZMM_13+FS_ZMM_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log250405.17 step1 runTheMatrix-results/250405.17_ZTT_13+FS_ZTT_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_ZTT_13+FS_ZTT_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log250407.17 step1 runTheMatrix-results/250407.17_NuGun_UP17+FS_NuGun_UP17_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_NuGun_UP17+FS_NuGun_UP17_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log250408.17 step1 runTheMatrix-results/250408.17_QCD_FlatPt_15_3000HS_13+FS_QCD_FlatPt_15_3000HS_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_QCD_FlatPt_15_3000HS_13+FS_QCD_FlatPt_15_3000HS_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log250409.17 step1 runTheMatrix-results/250409.17_SMS-T1tttt_mGl-1500_mLSP-100_13+FS_SMS-T1tttt_mGl-1500_mLSP-100_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_SMS-T1tttt_mGl-1500_mLSP-100_13+FS_SMS-T1tttt_mGl-1500_mLSP-100_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log |
Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
@makortel @zhenhu @ssekmen we have encountered again the problem from #25513.
What should we do about this? Can we launch another relval that will produce the needed output? |
I'd think the only option is to produce a new pileup library with |
So, it seems a possible solution would be: |
@zhenhu we may merge this PR, as it will fix part of the problem. But I do not think you need this to build the new library, all the ingredients should be already in the release, right? |
OK, then I will build the new library with 10_2_9 plus these new changes. Once the job finished, we can update the input path here and test workflows again. |
@kpedro88 premix library workflow injected
The output dataset name would be However, due to the computing issue reported in JIRA4232, all the relvals we submitted recently were stuck there. So we don't know when this file will be available. |
Hi @kpedro88 , the premix library is ready |
please test workflow 25400.17,250399.0,250400.17,250402.17,250405.17,250406.17,250407.17,250408.17,250409.17 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Implements suggestion in #25490 (comment)
attn: @ssekmen @zhenhu @fabiocos