Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

separate baseDataSetRelease values for fastsim 2017 #25626

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 16, 2019

Conversation

kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

Implements suggestion in #25490 (comment)

attn: @ssekmen @zhenhu @fabiocos

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for CMSSW_10_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@pgunnell, @zhenhu, @prebello, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test workflow 25400.17,250399.0,250400.17,250402.17,250405.17,250406.17,250407.17,250408.17,250409.17
(here I am testing every fastsim workflow that failed in the last IB, for completeness)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 11, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/32536/console Started: 2019/01/11 18:25

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 55227c1

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25626/32536/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following workflows:
250400.17 step1

runTheMatrix-results/250400.17_ZEE_13+FS_ZEE_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_ZEE_13+FS_ZEE_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log

250402.17 step1
runTheMatrix-results/250402.17_TTbar_13+FS_TTbar_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_TTbar_13+FS_TTbar_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log

250406.17 step1
runTheMatrix-results/250406.17_ZMM_13+FS_ZMM_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_ZMM_13+FS_ZMM_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log

250405.17 step1
runTheMatrix-results/250405.17_ZTT_13+FS_ZTT_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_ZTT_13+FS_ZTT_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log

250407.17 step1
runTheMatrix-results/250407.17_NuGun_UP17+FS_NuGun_UP17_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_NuGun_UP17+FS_NuGun_UP17_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log

250408.17 step1
runTheMatrix-results/250408.17_QCD_FlatPt_15_3000HS_13+FS_QCD_FlatPt_15_3000HS_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_QCD_FlatPt_15_3000HS_13+FS_QCD_FlatPt_15_3000HS_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log

250409.17 step1
runTheMatrix-results/250409.17_SMS-T1tttt_mGl-1500_mLSP-100_13+FS_SMS-T1tttt_mGl-1500_mLSP-100_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS/step1_SMS-T1tttt_mGl-1500_mLSP-100_13+FS_SMS-T1tttt_mGl-1500_mLSP-100_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS.log

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

@makortel @zhenhu @ssekmen we have encountered again the problem from #25513.

  1. "--pileup_input" : "dbs:/RelValFS_PREMIXUP17_PU50/%s/PREMIX"%(baseDataSetRelease[18],),
    needs to have /PREMIX changed to /GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW to select a dataset with the correct event content. I can make this change, however:
  2. The only 10_2_X dataset for /RelValFS_PREMIXUP17_PU50 is /RelValFS_PREMIXUP17_PU50/CMSSW_10_2_8-PU25ns_102X_mc2017_realistic_v5_FastSim-v1/PREMIX, so we have nothing to provide that will work in this release.

What should we do about this? Can we launch another relval that will produce the needed output?

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

I'd think the only option is to produce a new pileup library with GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW data tier and including L1,DIGI2RAW steps.

@zhenhu
Copy link
Contributor

zhenhu commented Jan 12, 2019

So, it seems a possible solution would be:
First get this PR merged and build an temporary official release (but missing the premix library input).
Then I will produce the missing input /RelValFS_PREMIXUP17_PU50/CMSSW_10_2_10-PU25ns_XXXXX/PREMIX in this new release, which will fix the input issue.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@zhenhu we may merge this PR, as it will fix part of the problem. But I do not think you need this to build the new library, all the ingredients should be already in the release, right?

@zhenhu
Copy link
Contributor

zhenhu commented Jan 12, 2019

OK, then I will build the new library with 10_2_9 plus these new changes. Once the job finished, we can update the input path here and test workflows again.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zhenhu yes, the missing library can be produced without this PR. I think that is a better way to go.

Please note, the library needs to be produced as GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW (with the steps L1,DIGI2RAW included). You can read #25513 for details.

@zhenhu
Copy link
Contributor

zhenhu commented Jan 12, 2019

@kpedro88 premix library workflow injected

cmsDriver.py SingleNuE10_cfi  --conditions auto:phase1_2017_realistic --pileup_input das:/RelValMinBiasFS_13_UP17_ForMixing/CMSSW_10_2_8-102X_mc2017_realistic_v5_FastSim-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO --fast  --era Run2_2017_FastSim --eventcontent PREMIX --procModifiers premix_stage1 --relval 100000,500 -s GEN,SIM,RECOBEFMIX,DIGI,L1,DIGI2RAW --datatier GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW --pileup AVE_50_BX_25ns --io FS_PREMIXUP17_PU50.io --python FS_PREMIXUP17_PU50.py

The output dataset name would be /RelValFS_PREMIXUP17_PU50/CMSSW_10_2_9-PU25ns_102X_mc2017_realistic_v5_FastSim-v1/GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW

However, due to the computing issue reported in JIRA4232, all the relvals we submitted recently were stuck there. So we don't know when this file will be available.

@zhenhu
Copy link
Contributor

zhenhu commented Jan 15, 2019

Hi @kpedro88 , the premix library is ready
/RelValFS_PREMIXUP17_PU50/CMSSW_10_2_9-PU25ns_102X_mc2017_realistic_v5_FastSim-v1/GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW
Could you please update the dataset name in this PR?

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test workflow 25400.17,250399.0,250400.17,250402.17,250405.17,250406.17,250407.17,250408.17,250409.17
thanks @zhenhu

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 15, 2019

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/32619/console Started: 2019/01/15 17:16

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #25626 was updated. @pgunnell, @zhenhu, @prebello, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@zhenhu
Copy link
Contributor

zhenhu commented Jan 15, 2019

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-25626/32619/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-25626/250399.0_FS_PREMIXUP15_PU25+FS_PREMIXUP15_PU25
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-25626/250400.17_ZEE_13+FS_ZEE_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-25626/250402.17_TTbar_13+FS_TTbar_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-25626/250405.17_ZTT_13+FS_ZTT_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-25626/250406.17_ZMM_13+FS_ZMM_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-25626/250407.17_NuGun_UP17+FS_NuGun_UP17_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-25626/250408.17_QCD_FlatPt_15_3000HS_13+FS_QCD_FlatPt_15_3000HS_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-25626/250409.17_SMS-T1tttt_mGl-1500_mLSP-100_13+FS_SMS-T1tttt_mGl-1500_mLSP-100_13_PRMXUP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS
  • /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/results/JR-comparison/PR-25626/25400.17_ZEE_13+FS_ZEE_13_UP17_PU50+HARVESTUP17FS+MINIAODMCUP17FS

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 31
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3007400
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3007208
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 190
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 30 files compared)
  • Checked 129 log files, 14 edm output root files, 31 DQM output files

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

+upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_10_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_10_5_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants