-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Import first bunch of features for NanoAOD v2 #22679
Conversation
arizzi
commented
Mar 20, 2018
- minor fixes (genlevel masses of bosons and isEE is EB)
- era switches for MiniAOD V1 vs V2 inputs
Issue described here: #114
Whitelist gen-level W,Z from >10 GeV mass cut
added comment that L2L3Residual JEC are safe to use for MC
fixed segmentation violation that occurred in subjet analyses in case…
Add two photon sc eta bits to nanoaod
Add eras run2_nanoAOD_94XMiniAODv1 and run2_nanoAOD_94XMiniAODv2
A new Pull Request was created by @arizzi for CMSSW_9_4_AN_X. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Eras @monttj, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @gpetruc, @arizzi, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
done... I'm not sure anyhow if the bot will recompute the signatures needed |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
@slava77 I think they were separated, it was just github not recomputing the base. |
it is submitted to 9_4_AN_X also because we need it integrated and built on short timescale, possibly bypassing some code review checks as agreed in the scope of AN releases. |
Import first bunch of features for NanoAOD v2 (same as 94XAN #22679)
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|