Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move eta phi region from reco egamma to math #22593

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 27, 2018

Conversation

perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

In a discussion started in https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/recoDevelopment/1576.html @fwyzard noticed that there was an unwanted remaining dependence of Geometry on Reco.

The RecoEcal/EgammaCoreTools/interface/EcalEtaPhiRegion.h was not specific for reco, and not even strictly to ECAL, as it just provides a method to verify whether a given (eta,phi) direction is inside a given rectangular region in the eta,phi plane.

The idea was therefore to move the class into DataFormats/Math, where there are already other similar classes, and rename it more generically and without any reference to ECAL. The name "EtaPhiRegion" was already taken by a struct defined in RecoEgamma/EgammaHLTProducers/interface/HLTCaloObjInRegionsProducer.h. Therefore, in order to avoid possible duplicates, I opted to "RectangularEtaPhiRegion".

Comments about the name and the position of the moved package are welcome.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @perrotta for master.

It involves the following packages:

Calibration/HcalIsolatedTrackReco
DQMOffline/CalibCalo
DQMOffline/EGamma
DataFormats/Math
Geometry/EcalMapping
RecoEcal/EgammaClusterAlgos
RecoEcal/EgammaClusterProducers
RecoEcal/EgammaCoreTools
RecoEgamma/EgammaHLTProducers

@perrotta, @ghellwig, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @arunhep, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @dmitrijus, @Martin-Grunewald, @silviodonato, @franzoni, @jfernan2, @cmsbuild, @cerminar, @slava77, @fwyzard, @vanbesien, @lpernie can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Sam-Harper, @battibass, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @jainshilpi, @varuns23, @tocheng, @lgray, @calderona, @HuguesBrun, @rovere, @rociovilar, @mmusich, @argiro, @ebrondol, @folguera, @drkovalskyi this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77, @fabiocos you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 13, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/26811/console Started: 2018/03/13 12:38

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-22593/26811/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 29
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2477528
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2477351
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 176
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.959999999977 KiB( 22 files compared)
  • Checked 118 log files, 9 edm output root files, 29 DQM output files

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Mar 13, 2018

+1

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@arunhep
Copy link
Contributor

arunhep commented Mar 13, 2018

+1

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

@argiro : do you see any possible issue for ECAL DPG because of this PR?

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let me also add EGamma contacts here: @Sam-Harper @jainshilpi @varuns23
If nobody complains, by next week I will sign this for reco

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

  • (No complains arrived from ECal or EGamma)
  • Remove unwanted remaining dependence of Geometry on Reco by moving EcalEtaPhiRegion from RecoEcal/EgammaCoreTools to DataFormats/Math
    • Since the method is general enough, the reference to "Ecal" is dropped from its name
    • All dependencies in CMSSW are updated accordingly

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 60421ce into cms-sw:master Mar 27, 2018
@perrotta perrotta deleted the moveEtaPhiRegionFromRecoEgammaToMath branch March 27, 2018 07:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants