Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix systematic misalignment tool #12313

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 10, 2015

Conversation

hroskes
Copy link
Contributor

@hroskes hroskes commented Nov 8, 2015

Fix the test script which hasn't been working for a while, and simplify its use

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 8, 2015

A new Pull Request was created by @hroskes (Heshy Roskes) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

Fix systematic misalignment tool

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/TrackerAlignment

@cmsbuild, @mmusich, @diguida, @franzoni, @cerminar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mschrode, @ghellwig, @mmusich, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' or '@cmsbuild, please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@diguida
Copy link
Contributor

diguida commented Nov 9, 2015

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9519/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2015

poolDbService->writeOne<Alignments>(&(*myAlignments), poolDbService->beginOfTime(), theAlignRecordName);
poolDbService->writeOne<AlignmentErrorsExtended>(&(*myAlignmentErrorsExtended), poolDbService->beginOfTime(), theErrorRecordName);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hroskes what is the reason to remove the possibility to write the APEs? I think it might still be useful even if it's not directly used.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't really see the use case. All it did was take the APEs from the GT (or input sqlite file if you want) and copy them to the output sqlite file. What would it even mean to "misalign" the APEs?

If you think it would be useful I can add it back.

I'd like to extend this soon by adding misalignment for surface deformations, but I want to understand them better first.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The use case is exactly this: take the APEs from the GT (or input sqlite file if you want) and copy them to the output sqlite file. Indeed it doesn't make sense to misalign the APE, but creating an APE payload that matches the misalignment you create makes a lot of sense to me. This functionality is not available but costs little effort to implement.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2015

@hroskes
Copy link
Contributor Author

hroskes commented Nov 9, 2015

@cmsbuild

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2015

Pull request #12313 was updated. @cmsbuild, @mmusich, @diguida, @franzoni, @cerminar can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Nov 9, 2015

please test

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Nov 9, 2015

+1
provided jenkins agrees

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2015

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9537/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2015

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2015

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 9, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2015
@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit d8249f0 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_0_X Nov 10, 2015
davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2015
davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2015
@hroskes hroskes deleted the fix-systematic-misalignments-80X branch November 11, 2015 12:22
cmsbuild added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants