fix rec hits vs ls in tracking DQM code

[mtosi]

asdescribed in JIRA ticket https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSTRACK-135
we need to update the monitoring of the rec hits vs LS
(make use of valid hits)

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mtosi (mia tosi) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

fix rec hits vs ls in tracking DQM code

It involves the following packages:

DQM/TrackingMonitor

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[deguio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 3072e95
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10093/80/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10093/80/summary.html

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
25202.0 step 3
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 3072e95
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10093/8594/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10093/8594/summary.html