ProductNotFound exception in workflow 20834.501

[makortel]

Workflow 20834.501 step 5 fails in CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-28-1100 with

----- Begin Fatal Exception 28-Oct-2022 16:06:45 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'ProductNotFound' occurred while
   [0] Processing  Event run: 1 lumi: 2 event: 103 stream: 2
   [1] Running path 'pathALCARECOEcalESAlign'
   [2] Calling method for module TrackSelector/'esSelectedTracks'
Exception Message:
Principal::getByToken: Found zero products matching all criteria
Looking for type: std::vector<reco::Track>
Looking for module label: generalTracks
Looking for productInstanceName: 

   Additional Info:
      [a] If you wish to continue processing events after a ProductNotFound exception,
add "SkipEvent = cms.untracked.vstring('ProductNotFound')" to the "options" PSet in the configuration.

----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/logreader/el8_amd64_gcc10/CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-28-1100/pyRelValMatrixLogs/run/20834.501_TTbar_14TeV+2026D88_Patatrack_PixelOnlyCPU+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14INPUT+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal+ALCAPhase2/step5_TTbar_14TeV+2026D88_Patatrack_PixelOnlyCPU+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14INPUT+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal+ALCAPhase2.log#/

[cmsbuild]

A new Issue was created by @makortel Matti Kortelainen.

@Dr15Jones, @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio, @makortel, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign/assign? Thanks.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[makortel]

Likely caused by #39858

[makortel]

assign alca

FYI @mmusich

[cmsbuild]

New categories assigned: alca

@yuanchao,@francescobrivio,@malbouis,@saumyaphor4252,@tvami,@ChrisMisan you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

[mmusich]

FYI @cms-sw/upgrade-l2

[mmusich]

I would have naively thought that this

cmssw/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py

Lines 658 to 660 in d296a53

	# skip ALCA and Nano steps (but not RecoNano or HARVESTNano for Run3)
	if 'ALCA' in step or 'Nano'==step:
	stepDict[stepName][k] = None

would have protected the workflow, but certainly I am missing something.

[mmusich]

OK

diff --git a/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py b/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py
index 54db5bf1522..06033728cb9 100644
--- a/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py
+++ b/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py
@@ -630,6 +630,7 @@ class PatatrackWorkflow(UpgradeWorkflow):
                 'HARVESTNano',
                 'Nano',
                 'ALCA',
+                'ALCAPhase2'
             ],
             PU = [],
             **kwargs)

solves.
PR will come in a minute.

[mmusich]

see #39917

[makortel]

The same exception occurs also in 20834.21, 20834.5, and 20834.502 (the list might not be exhaustive as the tests are still being run)

[mmusich]

The same exception occurs also in 20834.21, 20834.5, and 20834.502

PR #39917 has been updated accordingly

(the list might not be exhaustive as the tests are still being run)

I will update it as more appear (if any)